Starts from java 8 to iterate throug list I can use both:

List list=new ArrayList();1. list.forEach(...)2. list.stream().forEach(...)

Is it any advantages of using second case? To convert list to stream?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Roman C java 2 days ago

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    There are no advantages of using the second case, unless you have a parallel stream. There is a disadvantage, namely that Stream.forEach() doesn't guarantee to respect encounter order. A more accurate (but still unnecessary) equivalent would be Stream.forEachOrdered().

    share|improve this answer
    • Does the non-guarantee of encounter order of forEach also apply to non parallel streams that have ordered source?– tsolakpFeb 14 at 21:36
    • 2
      @tsolakp Briefly, yes. See here for more: stackoverflow.com/q/34247318/1553851– shmoselFeb 14 at 21:40
    • Someone got to write better Javadoc:). Here is snippet from Javadoc as well. "If a stream is ordered, repeated execution of identical stream pipelines on an identical source will produce an identical result;"– tsolakpFeb 14 at 21:48
    • @shmosel plus one, I just did not find the right words that even if forEach operates only via side-effects, adding elements to a list via stream().forEach is strongly discouraged and it might produce wrong results, while the other one would be ok.– EugeneFeb 14 at 21:57
    • 2
      @Eugene OP never mentioned such a use. As for side-effects in general, I'll just quote the docs: A small number of stream operations, such as forEach() and peek(), can operate only via side-effects; these should be used with care.– shmoselFeb 14 at 22:14

    No, in theory, the second option is worse than the first one - you pay the cost of instantiation/garbage-collection and calling a Stream instance and don't really get any benefit in return.

    Additionally, in theory the iteration order of Stream.forEach() isn't deterministic.

    share|improve this answer

      Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.